There is not a section for it but I thought I would suggest this feature as I could see me needing it soon. It would be great if there was a way to group survos together to keep them better organized. The way it is now there is just one big list of survos. If I want to create a app for different customers then this list will become to large to manage.
Tom, thanks for the suggestion, we'll take note of that. I do want to mention that you should now be able to sort the Survo screen based on name. So if you name the Survo's by project (i.e. project1into, project1main, project2into, etc), then you should be able to see them all together.
May be we need to have a folder or thread structure (i.e. basically a survo tree) to keep Survo's organized like how web pages are organized on web server.
We should also be able to make copies and rename them across different folders to avoid re-writing or to make slight modification to existing survo without breaking dependent functionality. At times we don't need to rename a Survo instead we need to reference another Survo from a common folder like calling a common survo from a specific survo.
You concept about these survo forms is great but when people want to express complex cases, it will become wieldy and too hard to maintin like how writing a c++ project old style was improved in visual studio to have project workspace and later on they added project group to keep all related dependent files together. I believe we should have atleast 2 levels like this and an ability to refer to common folders in level 1.
May be you need to raise this concern immediately to your architect or Irv, as I foresee it as an big issue in near future.
Thanks for the feedback. Currently while we do not support survo tree/folder structure, you can sort by survo name. One suggestion is to prefix your survo names into categories to help better structure your survo collection. I will add your request to our request list of feature enhancements. Thanks again.
